Robert I. Goldman Professor of European Studies and Professor of Sociology and African and African American Studies
Senior Adviser on Faculty Development and Diversity, Faculty of Arts and Sciences
Biographical Note
MICHÈLE LAMONT is Robert I. Goldman Professor of European Studies and Professor of Sociology and African and African American Studies at Harvard University. She is a fellow of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research and is co-director of its research program on Successful Societies.
Lamont’s scholarly interests center on shared concepts of worth and excellence, and their impact on hierarchies in a number of social domains. She has written on how the meanings given to worth (including moral worth) to ethno-racial and class inequality, on the definitions and determinants of societal excellence, and on the evaluation of excellence in higher education. Recent areas of interest include group boundaries, racism and anti-racism (how members of stigmatized groups respond to racism and discrimination), how culture matters for poverty, shared criteria of evaluation for qualitative social sciences, disciplinary cultures, and interdisciplinarity . A former Guggenheim fellow, her research has been supported by the Center for Advanced Research in the Behavioral Sciences, the German Marshall Fund of the United States, the Institute for Advanced Studies, the Lilly Endowment, the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Studies, the Russell Sage Foundation, and the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada. She has also received numerous grants from the National Science Foundation. She serves on the editorial boards of a number of journals and the advisory boards in Europe, Canada, and the United States. She also served as chair of the Council for European Studies from 2006 to 2009. In 2010 she was appoited to the Haut Conseil de la Science and Technologie, which helps the French government develop policies in the areas of higher education, research, and science and technology.
Born in Toronto in 1957, Lamont received a B.A. (1978) and a Masters (1979) in political theory at Ottawa University, before pursuing her doctoral research in sociology at the Université de Paris, where she graduated in 1983. She held a post-doctoral fellowship at Stanford University (1983-1985) and took her first position at the University of Texas at Austin (1985-1987). Appointed Assistant Professor of Sociology at Princeton University in 1987, she was promoted to tenure in 1993 and to the rank of full professor in 2000. She moved to Harvard University in 2003 and was appointed Robert I. Goldman Professor of European Studies in 2006.
New books!
Successful Societies: How Institutions and Culture Matter for Health (Cambridge University Press, August 2009, with Peter A. Hall) Why are some types of societies more successful than others at promoting individual and collective well-being? Focusing on population health as an indicator of social success, this book opens up new perspectives on the ways in which social relations condition health and the public policies that address it. Based on four years of dialogue among scholars from diverse disciplines, it offers social epidemiologists broader views of the social determinants of health and social scientists a sense of the fascinating puzzles of population health. The chapters consider health inequalities in the developing, as well as developed, world. They locate their roots, not only in economic resources, but in the social resources provided by the institutions and cultural repertoires constitutive of social relations. They examine the AIDS epidemic in Africa, the sources of the health gradient, the role of collective imaginaries, destigmatization strategies, and the historical basis for effective health policies. This project was featured at the 2008 National Summit on Poverty and Communication (Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia). For a summary, see "What makes a society succeed?" and "Successful Societies."
How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment The book draws on interviews with scholars who serve on funding panels to analyze cultures of excellence across disciplines. How do we decide what is good? How do we come to think of our judgments as fair? How do we understand the place of self-interests and interpersonal connections in our evaluation? How do we blend diversity and excellence? How do economists, philosophers, anthropologists English professors, historians, and political scientists compare? What is the role of emotions and interaction in the evaluation process? This book opens up the black box of peer review to offer a unique peek into what happens behind the door of secretive deliberative chambers.... To order a copy of the book, click here.
The Evaluation of Systematic Qualitative Research in the Social Sciences (National Science Foundation, November 2008, with Patricia White). As an expert on evaluation in the social sciences, Lamont was asked by the National Science Foundation report to convene a panel of anthropologists, political scientists, sociologists and law and society scholars to discuss how to evaluate qualitative social science research. This report describes the standards that are shared across disciplines. It also includes papers written by more than twenty contributors on various dimensions of the evaluation process and on how to produce excellent proposals.
Forthcoming!!
"Reconsidering Culture and Poverty" (with Mario Luis Small and David J. Harding). The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
To bridge the gap between poverty scholars and culture scholars, the editors have assembled papers around the topic "Reconsidering Culture and Poverty." Chapters concern cultural orientations concerning upward mobility, finding a job, and sexual behavior, fatherhood, civic participation, and other topics. Contributors include Nathan Fosse, Joshua Guetzkow, Biju Rao, Paromita Sanyal, Sandra Smith, Stephen Vaisey, Maureen Waller, and William Julius Wilson. We hope that this issue will demonstrate the importance of cultural concepts for poverty research, serve as a model and a resource for poverty scholars who wish to incorporate cultural concepts into their research, assist in the training of future scholars working at the nexus of poverty and culture, and identify crucial areas for future methodological, theoretical, and empirical development.
Social Sciences in the Making (edited in collaboration with Charles Camic and Neil Gross). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Over the past quarter century, the interdisciplinary field of science studies has grown enormously as scholars have examined the physical and biological sciences through a variety of social and historical lenses. By contrast, the social study of the intellectual fields that comprise the social sciences and the humanities remains underdeveloped. Although a large number of scholars are interested in the social dimensions of knowledge production in the social sciences and are engaged in both theory building and empirical research in the area, their ideas and findings have yet to be interlinked and brought into dialogue with one another. As a result, there is little coherent understanding of the processes of knowledge production, organization, and distribution in these fields. This collective volume which analyzes aspects of knowledge production and evaluation practices across a range of disciplines addresses this gap and offers a new research agenda for the study of knowledge production and evaluative practices in the social sciences.
Research:
Lamont has published over sixty articles and book chapters in a wide range of journals including American Sociological Review, American Journal of Sociology, Annual Review of Sociology, Sociological Theory, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales, Research Evaluation, French Politics, Culture and Society, Poetics, Journal of Consumer Culture, and Science, Technology and Human Values. Her books include The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press and New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2000); and Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992). The Dignity of Working Men received the 2000 C. Wright Mills Award of the Society for the Study of Social Problems, and the Mattei Dogan Award for the Best Comparativist Book in 2001 from the Society for Comparative Research. It was also selected as a 2000 Noteworthy Books in Industrial Relations and Labor Economics of the Industrial Relations Section, Princeton University. The Dignity of Working Men was published in French in 2002; Money Morals and Manners was published in French in 1994 and chosen by Le Monde as one of the best books of the year.
Lamont has also written on the impact of culture of poverty. She recently co-authored for the UNESCO World Report on Cultural Diversity a background paper on Cultural Diversity and Poverty Eradication (with Mario Small; 2007).
Over the next few years, Lamont’s research focuses on three areas 1) explaining variations in responses to racism and their impact on health; 2) the production and evaluation of knowledge; and 3) processes of evaluation.
1) Responses to racism; This line of work involves three different projects that are embedded in one another:
A) African-American Responses to Racism and Discrimination (funded by the National Science Foundation, with the assistance of Crystal Fleming and Jessica Welburn). Having completed 160 in-depth interviews with African-Americans living in and around New York, the study analyzes the discursive and behavioral strategies that members of stigmatized groups use to cope with racism and discrimination. It compares the accounts of these strategies produced by middle and working class men and women ages 25-60 and considers how the range and salience of strategies are affected by perceived discrimination. The project also considers the association between strategies and mental health outcomes, with the goal of contributing to the literature on mental health and racial disparity, which has traditionally been more concerned with risk than with resilience, and with intra-individual processes as opposed to meaning-making. The intellectual significance of the project is to lay the bases for a grounded theory of everyday anti-racism that draws on insights from other literatures.
B) A Comparative Study of Responses to Discrimination by Members of Stigmatized Groups (funded by the Weatherhead Initiative in International Affairs and the United States - Israel Binational Science Foundation, in collaboration with Crystal Fleming, Hanna Herzog, Nissim Mizrahi, Elisa Reis, Graziella Silva, and Jessica Welburn). This international multidisciplinary project analyzes the discursive and behavioral strategies that members of stigmatized groups use to cope with racism and discrimination. We compare the accounts of these strategies produced by middle and working class men and women ages 18 to 70. We focus on members of minority groups living in mixed cities: negros in Rio de Janiero, African-Americans in New York (see above), and Ethiopian immigrants, Mizrahis, and Muslim Palestinian citizens in Tel Aviv/Jaffa. We study how the range and salience of strategies are affected by perceived discrimination across these national contexts. The project also considers the association between strategies and mental health outcomes, with the goal of contributing to the literature on mental health and racial disparity, which has traditionally been more concerned with risk than with resilience, and with intra-individual processes as opposed to meaning-making. Having completed the coding of the data, we are now preparing a special issue of the Journal of Ethnic and Racial Studies on the results of our research. . We are also preparing a volume that will offer a systematic comparison of the US, Brazil and Israeli cases, and organizing a cinference in comparative anti-racism which will be held at Harvard in April 2010.
C) Successful Societies -- Phase 2. (funded by the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, in collaboration with Peter A. Hall, project co-director). This five-year project expands our inquiry in the conditions that foster societal success and well -being by focusing on a) the impact of welfare regime on health inequality; b) institutional transfers; and c) collective identity and recognition. Researchers consider how social resilience is fostered by institutions and cultural repertoires, such as collective myths and shared conceptions of cultural citizenship. This program is directly connected to the Weatherhead Initiative project, but include a broader range of American and international collaborators.
2) The Production and Evaluation of Knowledge:
Successful Interdisciplinarity (funded by the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, in collaboration with Veronica Boix-Mansilla and Kyoko Sato). This project analyzes the development of shared cognitive platforms in the research networks of the Santa Fe Institute, the MacArthur Foundation, and CIFAR. To advance and support productive interdisciplinary integration we must understand the phenomenon of integrative cognitive platforms in its emotional, epistemic, cognitive, social and institutional dimensions alike. One must ponder: in projects where knowledge integration is deemed crucial, what cognitive coordination strategies and shared intellectual platforms enable successful interdisciplinary groups to integrate disciplinary perspectives? How do these groups establish and negotiate trust, authority, and belonging vis-à- vis their shared topical focus? What instruments do funding agencies have to facilitate institutional restructuring toward knowledge integration? What can the recipient organizations do to facilitate effective synthesis? A close investigation of how effective interdisciplinary groups at different points of development construct and sustain integrative platforms can inform the development of an actionable framework designed to support interdisciplinary initiatives in the future.
3) Processes of Evaluation
A) “Towards a Sociology of Valuation: Convergence, Divergence,
and Synthesis,” with Ezra Zuckerman. In preparation for Annual
Review of Sociology, 2011. This paper discusses the literatures
on evaluation in a range of fields (including cultural sociology
and economic sociology) and identifies fundamental processes at
work across domains.
B) Real Estate Agents as Cultural Brokers (funded by the Real
Estate Initiative, Harvard University, in collaboration with
Lauren Rivera.) More than mere brokers of material goods,
realtors are cultural brokers whose work is intimately
intertwined with the production and signaling of value. Their
livelihood is dependent upon successfully reading the tastes and
economic worth of clients, finding properties that match these
characteristics, and convincing clients that the properties they
find are worth investment. Realtors are charged not only with
convincing buyers that they have found the “right” property, but
they are the “right” person to make the sale. Successful
realtors must also be able to signal to clients that they are
competent, trustworthy professionals who possess the skills,
local knowledge, and cultural expertise necessary to identify
the most appropriate properties for their clients. Thus, they
are “experts” in detecting and communicating cultural signals.
Yet, existing studies of realtors have neglected their role as
cultural intermediaries to focus primarily on the demographic
characteristics of agents, particularly the overwhelmingly
white, educated, and female nature of the profession. We aim to
fill this significant gap by analyzing realtors as cultural
brokers and as an occupational group with a distinct cultural
identity. The project draws on in-depth interviews conducted
with realtors in New York City and Boston.
Teaching and Service:
In recent years Lamont has taught undergraduate courses on
"Culture, Power, and Inequality," "Racism and Anti-Racism in
Comparative Perspective," and "Knowledge Production and
Evaluation." At the graduate level, she taught "Qualitative Data
Analysis," "Classical Sociological Theory," and "Culture and
Inequality." Lamont has been active as a mentor of post-doctoral
fellows, graduate students, and undergraduate students, advising
research on a wide range of topics. Her collaborators and
advisees have been hired by top departments such at Cornell University
(Maureen Waller), Harvard University (Natasha Warikoo), London School of
Economics (Jonathan White), New York University (Ann Morning), Northwestern
University (Gregoire Mallard), The New School (Virag Molnar), UCLA (Abigail Saguy),
University of Arizona (Josh Guetzkow), and the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill (Margarita Mooney). For the last six years, she has co-organized the Culture and
Social Analysis Workshop, where faculty, post-doctoral
researchers and graduate students and visitors come together to
share their work in progress. She is also the co-
organizer of the Study Group on Exclusion and Inclusion in an Expanded Europe of the Center for European Studies, which has
been holding monthly meetings since 2005.
Lamont is regularly invited as visiting professor to various
European universities. Most recently, she served as “professeure
invitée” at the Fondation nationale de science politique (June
2006 and 2008), Université de Paris VIII (June 2007), and at the Universite de Paris X (June 2009).
Lamont has been elected to a number of positions in professional
associations. After serving as chair of the Culture Section and
the Theory Section of the American Sociological Association, she
was elected Member-at-Large of the Council of this organization
where she served from 2005 to 2008. She served on several
committee of this organization, most recently as Chair of the
Committee on Awards in 2007-2008. She has also served on
committees of the Eastern Sociological Association and the
International Sociological Association. She has been serving as
Chair of the Council for European Studies since 2006.
Since moving to Harvard, Lamont has served on a number of
committees of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, such as the
Social Science Advisory Council and the Educational Policy
Committee. Her current commitments include the University
Taskforce on Common Space, the Steering Committee and the
Executive Committee of the Weatherhead Center for International
Affairs, the Executive Committee of the Center for European
Studies, the Committee for the Status of Women, the Board of
Advisers of the DuBois Institute, and the Interdisciplinary
Standing Committee on Global Health. She also serves as Director
of the European Network on Inequality of the Multidisciplinary
Program on Inequality and Public Policy at the Kennedy School of
Government.
Selected publications
Please note that posting of both published and unpublished papers for downloading is intended for educational purposes only and that adherence to copyright laws is assumed.
"Looking Back at Bourdieu" in Cultural Analysis and Bourdieu’s Legacy: Settling Accounts and Developing Alternatives, Elizabeth Silva and Alan Warde (eds). London: Routledge. (Forthcoming)