Cognition, Brain, & Behavior Research Seminar
(Psychology 3340. Research Seminar in Cognition, Brain, and Behavior)


Spring 2006
2/02/06 Jeremy Wolfe (Brigham & Women's Hospital / Harvard Medical School)
Visual Search: Is it a matter of life and death? [more...]
2/09/06 Anina Rich (Brigham & Women's Hospital / Harvard Medical School
Is attention critical in synaesthesia? Review and new data [more...]
2/16/06 Tania Lombrozo (Harvard Psychology)
Simplicity and probability in explanation [more...]
2/23/06 Sam Moulton (Harvard Psychology)
Does psi exist? [more...]
3/02/06 Matthew Finkbeiner (Harvard University)
Domain-specific processing in the left fusiform gyrus: Evidence from distractor interference and extinction [more...]
3/09/06 Matt Bronstad (Brandeis University)
Understanding facial beauty: A computational model of attractiveness judgements [more...]
3/16/06 Elissa Aminoff (Harvard Psychology)
Contextual associations: Implications for object recognition and memory [more...]
3/23/06 Joo-Hyun Song (Harvard Psychology)
Characteristics of visually-guided manual pointing: Continuous interaction between cognitive decision-making & actions [more...]
3/30/06 Spring Break
4/06/06 Alvaro Pascual-Leone (Beth Israel Medical Center)
What do the Blind teach us about Seeing? [more...]
4/13/06 Ned Sahin (Harvard Psychology)
Neuronal Circuits for Sequencing Stored Linguistic Elements [more...]
4/20/06 Tim Vickery (Harvard Psychology)
Interactions of feedback and attention during simple choice-making [more...]
4/27/06 John Gabrieli (MIT)
Enhancing Learning in the Human Brain: Evidence from Functional Neuroimaging [more...]
5/04/06 Kevin Shapiro (Harvard Psychology)
Nouns, Verbs, and the Brain [more...]



Thursdays at 12:00-1:30pm
William James Hall 765

Interested parties from outside the
Harvard community are welcome to attend.

E-mail Laura to subscribe to weekly e-mail reminders

Links:
Past speakers
Social Lunch
Social and Affective Neuroscience Series
Psychology Department

Questions?
Contact:
Laura Gibson (gibson@wjh)

Jeremy Wolfe
Visual Search: Is it a matter of life and death?


Like Gaul, this talk is divided into three parts: 1) I will give an introduction to the problem of visual search and to the Guided Search model that my lab has been working on for a number of years. 2) I will discuss an important practical problem in search. Rare targets are hard to find simply because they are rare. We ask people to find rare targets in some very important tasks like baggage screening and routine mammography so, if low target prevalence makes search difficult, this could be a real problem. Finally, I will place the problem of search into the larger context of visual perception and show how our need to use selective attention leads to some interesting perceptual errors.
Anina Rich
Is attention critical in synaesthesia? Review and new data


Synaesthesia is a fascinating phenomenon in which particular stimuli elicit unusual involuntary experiences. For example, a sound may induce a colour experience. In the most common form, seeing a letter results in a colour that is vivid and highly consistent over time. Synaesthetes get interference from these colours in Stroop-type tasks, but there is considerable debate regarding the necessity for inducing stimuli to be attended in order for synaesthesia to occur. I will review the evidence for and against 'preattentive' theories of synaesthesia and present data from a modified attentional blink task that suggest an important role for attention in this unusual phenomenon.
Tania Lombrozo
Simplicity and probability in explanation


Philosophers and scientists have extolled the virtues of simplicity for centuries. William of Occam, for example, is known for his stricture not to invoke more entities in explanation when less will do. Not surprisingly, contemporary undergraduates share the preference for simpler explanations. But the simplest explanation is not always the most likely. How is the preference for simpler explanations influenced by probability information? In this talk, I'll explore two related questions. First, how do simplicity and probability trade-off in evaluating explanations? And second, do explanatory criteria like simplicity influence probability judgments? That is, do people believe simpler explanations are more likely to be true? The data I'll report suggest that both simplicity and probability influence how explanations are evaluated, but that disproportionate probability information is required to override the preference for simpler explanations. What's more, committing to a simple but unlikely explanation can distort participants' estimates of frequency information. These findings are used to motivate the idea that the process of generating and evaluating explanations plays an important role in assessing subjective probability.
Sam Moulton
Does psi exist?


In its most conservative instantiation, the psi hypothesis asserts the anomalous presence of knowledge. A direct and promising strategy to quantify potential psi effects lies in neuroimaging approaches that make few assumptions about the nature of such knowledge. By circumventing behavior and directly examining brain activity we can increase the likelihood of uncovering a psi effect, and decrease the ambiguity of a null result. In this study, we relied upon the robust finding within cognitive neuroscience that prior knowledge of a stimulus biases the brain?s response to that stimulus, even when the prior knowledge is unconscious. We hypothesized that knowledge acquired through psi would similarly prime neuronal activity, and that evidence of priming associated with psi stimuli would offer compelling evidence for the existence of psi. Sixteen participants completed a simple binary guessing task while their brain activity was monitored using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) . In this task, participants viewed two sequential photographs and were asked to decide which image would shortly be randomly chosen by the computer; after participants indicated their choice on each trial, they were shown the target stimulus from the pair a second time. Outside the scanner, an emotionally-close or biologically-related partner viewed only the target stimuli. Thus all three hypothesized mechanisms of anomalous information acquisition -- precognition, telepathy, and clairvoyance -- could affect performance in this design. We analyzed Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) activity associated with target versus decoy stimuli in search for evidence of psi.
Matthew Finkbeiner
Domain-specific processing in the left fusiform gyrus: Evidence from distractor interference and extinction


Recent neuroimaging studies have revealed that letters activate both the left and right fusiform areas, but that only the left fusiform responds to letters more than to control stimuli. Though these findings suggest that the left fusiform is specialized in its function of identifying letters, it does not rule out the possibility that the right fusiform contributes critically to letter identification processes. To test this possibility, we used a behavioral word identification task with bilateral and unilateral displays to determine the cost of engaging the right hemisphere with a distractor stimulus. We found that while engaging the left hemisphere led to a robust interference effect, engaging the right hemisphere had no effect at all. In a separate neuroimaging study, participants were asked to indicate the presence of a flicker in rapidly presented streams of letters. Despite letters not being relevant to the task, fMRI revealed a robust modulation by attentional capture in the left (but not right) fusiform gyrus. Taken together, these findings indicate that the left fusiform is tuned to process letters and, hence, becomes selectively engaged (captured) whenever attention is drawn to the presence of letters.
Matt Bronstad
Understanding facial beauty: A computational model of attractiveness judgements


Humans share an aesthetic standard for faces, as people from different cultural and economic backgrounds tend to agree about which faces are attractive. Much research in the last two decades addressed the question of which aspects of facial appearance people use in forming attractiveness judgments. In particular, researchers sought to determine whether people are primarily sensitive to facial averageness, symmetry, or sexual dimorphism. We still have little understanding of how different aspects of appearance codetermine perceptions of attractiveness. I will present a computational model that replicates human attractiveness judgments given images of faces and attractiveness ratings of those images. The ratings and images are reduced into simpler image factors that are sensitive to aspects of facial appearance. These factors are strikingly similar to averageness, symmetry, and sexual dimorphism.
Elissa Aminoff
Contextual associations: Implications for object recognition and memory


Objects in our environment are clustered in typical contexts. Consequently, when you walk into a room and see a bed, for example, not only do you immediately identify the room as a bedroom, but you also expect to find nearby specific objects with high likelihood (e.g., a night table, an alarm clock, a dresser). This clustering of objects by contextual associations, can be used to increase efficiency in processing the wealth of perceptual information in our environment. Using fMRI, we have demonstrated that such contextual associations are processed in the parahippocampal cortex and the retrosplenial complex. This contextual processing, which usually facilitates perception and cognition, can sometimes elicit distortions of memory. Specifically, we hypothesized that seeing a highly contextual object (e.g., a desk) would result in contextual co-activation such that observers might later falsely perceive a related object (e.g., an office chair) as having been previously presented. Furthermore, would brain activity in the context cortical network be more active at the time of encoding (i.e. viewing the desk) because of the increased activation of contextual associations when a false memory is likely to occur? We studied how contextual associations can affect memory and what brain areas predict the occurrence of a false memory. Results demonstrated that subjects are more likely to false alarm to contextually related item than to unrelated novel items. fMRI results showed differential activity that correlated with subsequent false recognition in the retrosplenial complex, but not in the parahippocampal cortex. The results from this study will be discussed in a larger framework of the role of the cortical context network and the influence of contextual associations on memory and its distortion.
Joo-Hyun Song
Characteristics of visually-guided manual pointing: Continuous interaction between cognitive decision-making & actions


We examined characteristics of visually-guided manual pointing in humans, showing continuous interaction between cognitive decision making, and actions. In addition, results of our study demonstrate advantages of visually-guided action as a research tool to read out continuous cognitive processes over time. We showed that manual pointing directed to multiple stimuli can be concurrently planned and executed before decision-making is completed. This result demonstrates flexibility in visuo-motor control, casting doubt on prevalent assumptions regarding the existence of a unique solution for optimal control. We also demonstrated that the readiness of motor execution is not simply determined by the current trial itself. Manual pointing performance for the same trials depends on whether difficulties of trials are varied or maintained the same within a block. The result shows that it is not explicit knowledge of upcoming trials but history of the very recent past, which determines the current state of performance. Last, we show the applicability of visually- guided pointing in a number task, to reveal other properties of cognitive processing.
Alvaro Pascual-Leone
What do the Blind teach us about Seeing?


Much of the normal human brain appears to be dedicated to process visual information and vision provides a major source of information about our environment and a guide to our actions. What happens to all those parts of the brain in a person born blind? The human brain is capable of remarkable change and appears able to keep changing throughout life. These changes are summarized under the term plasticity and appear to be driven by a number of factors, including changes in the environment or in the information that reaches the brain. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that in the case of blindness, the parts of the brain normally devoted to process visual information may change and become involved in the processing of tactile or auditory information, or even in memory, language, or other cognitive tasks that might help the blind person cope better with the challenges of the lack of vision.

Indeed, in studies using positron emission tomography (PET) or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) subjects born blind show activation of their "visual" cortex when reading Braille, performing various other tactile tasks, identifying the location of a sound, and even completing a verbal memory task. This activation of the "visual" cortex for non-visual tasks is correlated with how well the blind subjects perform in the non-visual tasks, so that the more activation the better the sound localization ability or the verbal memory. In fact, congenitally blind subjects are better than sighted subjects at these non-visual tasks, perhaps because they are able to use the additional resources provided by the "visual cortex". Consistent with this idea, transient disruption of the visual cortex in early blind subjects using non-invasive transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) significantly impairs their ability to perform certain tactile, auditory, verbal memory and language tasks. Therefore, in the early blind, parts of the brain that normally process visual information are used for other non-visual functions. In this sense, the study of the blind brain provides a unique opportunity to investigate the plastic changes that can occur in response to changes in the input of information to the brain and inquire about their eventual behavioral consequences. Such issues of plasticity are critical for the adaptation to blindness and for novel approaches to restore sight to the blind. Blindness and visual loss are pervasive problems in our society and important causes of major disability. The insights discussed are of relevance for rehabilitation and education programs for the blind, including mobility, Braille learning, spatial orientation and object representation questions.

However, studying how the brain of blind people processes certain information provides also an opportunity to learn about visual perception and the organization of the brain in the sighted. In sighted subjects wearing a blindfold and thus being completely deprived of vision for even just a few days, there are dramatic changes in brain activity in response to tactile, auditory or verbal stimuli, that resemble those encountered in the blind. This extremely rapid plasticity suggests that non-visual information may be reaching the "visual cortex" even in normal sighted humans subjects by connections in the brain that that can be strengthened quickly in case of loss of vision. In this sense, comparing sighted, blindfolded, and blind people as they interact with their surrounding environment, recognize objects, handle tools, walk safely around their house or their city, locate the source of a sound or identify a friend by her voice, can teach us fundamental aspects of the workings of the human brain. Such studies using fMRI and TMS suggest that brain regions that were thought to be devoted to processing vision, do in fact respond to the sensorial information of the stimuli (such as object form, spatial localization, movement direction) independently from the sensory modality - vision, hearing or touch - that conveys the information to the brain. This implies that the brain may be organized in areas that do a certain operation regardless of the sensory modality that conveys the required information. An important issue for future research is to understand the normal brain connectivity between regions processing visual, tactile, auditory, and other cognitive information, and how such connectivity changes in the visually deprived.
Tim Vickery
Interactions of feedback and attention during simple choice-making


We explored competitive choice behavior and its neural underpinnings in several experiments using a simple game. In behavioral experiments, we examined the ability of humans to produce 'random' sequences of choices in a game context. We gave or witheld feedback in a 'penalty kick' game against a demanding AI opponent, and found that subjects produced more random sequences with feedback than without, although the sequences produced with feedback were still distinguishable from randomly generated sequences. By sometimes applying a taxing secondary task, we also found that this ability is dependent on central attentional resources. In fMRI experiments, we measured BOLD activity in humans as they played this game while being scanned. We devised criteria to identify regions of the brain that are selective for making uncertain choices on the basis of feedback, and distinguish these from regions that are more active when a task demands more effort or attention. Applying these criteria, we classified a region of the right inferior parietal lobule and a subset of frontal regions as specifically involved in choice-making under uncertainty.
John Gabrieli
Enhancing Learning in the Human Brain: Evidence from Functional Neuroimaging


Most of our knowledge about the organization of learning and memory in the human brain comes from studies of patients with focal lesions who exhibit impaired learning (amnesia). Functional neuroimaging now allows for the study of neural systems that promote human learning. I will review recently completed studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in which we examined how self-knowledge and motivation can promote declarative or episodic memory formation. I will also review a study in which we used real-time fMRI as a source of feedback to allow people learn how to gain direct control of activation in a targeted brain region, which in turn evoked the mental functions mediated by that brain region.
Kevin Shapiro
Nouns, Verbs, and the Brain


The grammatical categories 'noun' and 'verb' are universal across languages and represent the elementary building blocks of propositional speech. Nevertheless, it isn't clear how the brain categorizes words as nouns and verbs, or at what stage this information enters into the process of word production. For example, some have argued that the noun/verb distinction is essentially a semantic one, capturing a fundamental difference in meaning between words assigned to the two categories. Others view the distinction in syntactic terms, pointing out that nouns and verbs play different grammatical roles and are subject to different kinds of morphological processes. Using evidence from neuropsychological patients with impairments in word production, I will argue that apparently selective deficits in noun or verb processing can arise at either the semantic or the synactic level, leading to different patterns of errors in speech and comprehension. I will then describe several experiments using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that may shed light on the brain areas that subserve core semantic and syntactic processes in noun and verb production.